While attitudes can have a powerful
effect on behavior, they are not set in stone. The same influences that lead to
attitude formation can also create attitude change. People can change their
attitudes in two ways. First, they can be motivated to listen and think about
the message, which can lead to a shift in attitude. Or they might be influenced
by characteristics of the speaker, leading to a temporary shift in attitude.
Messages that are thought provoking and that appeal to the viewer are more
likely to lead to permanent changes in their attitude. As mentioned in the
previous post, people can also change their attitudes when they have
conflicting beliefs about a topic. In order to reduce the tension created by
these incompatible beliefs, people often shift their attitudes.
Dissonance Theory
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Dissonance Theory
Dissonance Theory refers to situations that involve conflicting attitudes, beliefs or behaviors. This produces a feeling of discomfort leading to an altered attitude, belief or behavior to reduce the discomfort. For example, when people smoke and they know that smoking causes cancer. It’s possible that certain attitudes may change depending on the person.
Dissonance is defined as the inconsistency or conflict while
cognitive refers to thinking or the mind.
Cognitive dissonance is the psychological conflict from holding two or
more beliefs at the same time. The theory replaces previous conditioning or
reinforcement theories by viewing individuals as more purposeful decision
makers that seek balance in their beliefs. If presented with decisions or information
that create conflict, they use dissonance-reduction to regain balance,
especially if the dissonance affects their self-esteem. The theory suggests that,
dissonance is psychologically uncomfortable enough to push people to achieve compatibility,
and in a state of dissonance, people will avoid information and situations that
might increase the conflict. It’s easy
to picture how this dissonance arises.
In this day and age, it may be unavoidable in an environment where we
are surrounded by information and media.
Mcleod,
S. (2008). Cognitive Dissonance. Retrieved from: http://www.simplypsychology.org/cognitive-dissonance.html
Festinger,
L. & Carlsmith, J.M. (1959). Cognitive Consquences of Forced Compliance. Journal
of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210. [available at http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Festinger}
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)